More In This Category
View Transcript
So we talk about the individual most people think that’s the only person but really you can look at the institutions and what I mean by that is the broader
organizations that introduce the victim to the perpetrator. Um sometimes there isn’t one but in a lot of cases there is. So um examples would be looking at a
private school if it was a teacher on student abuse situation or you know many people know the clergy cases um against different you know churches across the
country. Um, boy scouts would be one and I actually find that when you bring an action against the institution, you actually can get some broader public
like policy changes that can prevent this from happening again. So, examples would be like not letting adults be in rooms alone with, you know, younger
minors and you can see that at a school level or at another institutional level.
So, you can make broader changes to prevent this happening going forward. So in addition to helping our own client find accountability, you can also help it prevent, you know, abuse and
Contact Nicole Coates
Email This Lawyer
(203) 693-9412
See All This Lawyer's Videos
Visit Lawyer's Website
Stamford, CT personal injury attorney Nicole Coates talks about who can be held responsible beyond the individual who committed the abuse. She points out that in abuse cases, responsibility may extend beyond the individual perpetrator to include institutions that facilitated or enabled access to the victim. Depending on the circumstances, these institutions may include schools, religious organizations, youth programs, or other entities that had a duty to protect those in their care. She notes that examining the role of these organizations is often an important part of seeking accountability.
She further explains that claims against institutions can sometimes lead to broader reforms that help prevent similar misconduct from occurring in the future. Examples may include implementing stricter supervision policies, limiting unsupervised interactions between adults and minors, and strengthening safeguarding procedures. In her view, institutional accountability can create meaningful changes that extend beyond a single case.
She emphasizes that pursuing claims against responsible organizations can serve two important purposes: helping survivors obtain accountability and encouraging policy changes that reduce the risk of future abuse. By addressing systemic failures, these cases can contribute to safer environments for others. She believes that meaningful legal action can benefit both individual survivors and the broader community.
