Selling a Business Attorney in New York, New York

What mistakes do businesses make in mergers and acquisitions?

More In This Category

View Transcript

One of the biggest mistakes clients often make is succumbing to “deal fever.” They become so wrapped up in the excitement and adrenaline of the transaction that they lose sight of the risks involved. This over-optimism can lead them to take on risks they might not fully appreciate due to the heightened emotional state.

A common example of this is with earnouts, where a seller agrees to sell the business and be paid over time by the buyer. The seller typically believes there will be no issue in achieving the earnout targets, thinking everything will go smoothly. However, disagreements can arise later about the direction of the business, leading to a souring of the relationship. The seller then becomes disappointed when it becomes clear they might not receive the expected earnout, resulting in disputes and turning to their lawyer, asking how they can recover the expected payments.

Another frequent issue in mergers and acquisitions is clients becoming frustrated with their lawyers. They may perceive the lawyers as “deal killers” because the lawyers point out potential risks that clients need to be aware of. Clients are eager to finalize the transaction, but good lawyers also aim to ensure the deal is legally sound and that clients fully understand the risks they are assuming. The goal is to help clients achieve a successful transaction that minimizes disputes and disappointments down the line.

New York, NY business attorney Richard S. Green discusses common mistakes businesses make in mergers and acquisitions. He observes that one of the most common mistakes clients make is succumbing to “deal fever.” Enthralled by the excitement and momentum of a transaction, clients can lose sight of the associated risks. This over-optimism often leads them to take on exposures they may not fully appreciate, driven by the heightened emotional state of the moment.

He cites earnouts as a typical example. In such arrangements, a seller agrees to sell a business and receive payments over time from the buyer. Sellers often assume that meeting the earnout targets will be straightforward, expecting a smooth process. However, disputes can later arise regarding the business’s direction, straining the relationship. When it becomes apparent that the expected earnout may not be realized, sellers often turn to their lawyers seeking ways to recover the anticipated payments.

He also notes that clients frequently become frustrated with their lawyers during mergers and acquisitions. Lawyers may be perceived as “deal killers” for highlighting potential risks, even as clients are eager to close the transaction quickly. Yet, a competent lawyer’s role is to ensure the deal is legally sound and that clients fully understand the risks they assume. The ultimate objective is to guide clients toward a successful transaction while minimizing disputes and disappointments in the future.

More Videos From This Lawyer