More In This Category
View Transcript
A hostile takeover occurs when one party makes an unsolicited and uninvited bid for another company, as opposed to situations where a company is actively seeking to sell itself and is open to potential buyers. In a hostile takeover attempt, a party initiates a bid without the target company’s consent, putting the company “in play,” meaning the target then starts exploring alternative options.
More often, you’ll encounter cases where a company announces a friendly, negotiated transaction, only for a third party to step in with an uninvited bid for the target. A recent example is when Frontier proposed to take over Spirit Airlines, and JetBlue made a hostile counteroffer against Frontier. This eventually led to the termination of the deal, with JetBlue now in the process of attempting to acquire Spirit.
Contact Richard S. Green
Email This Lawyer
(212) 651-3903
See All This Lawyer's Videos
Visit Lawyer's Website
New York, NY business attorney Richard S. Green explains how a hostile takeover works. He explains that a hostile takeover occurs when one party makes an unsolicited and uninvited bid for another company, in contrast to situations where a company is actively seeking to sell itself and is receptive to potential buyers. In a hostile takeover, the initiating party acts without the target company’s consent, effectively putting the company “in play,” which prompts the target to explore alternative options.
He notes that it is more common to see scenarios where a company announces a friendly, negotiated transaction, only for a third party to submit an uninvited bid for the target. A recent example involves Frontier’s proposed acquisition of Spirit Airlines, which was met with a hostile counteroffer from JetBlue. This intervention ultimately led to the termination of the original deal, with JetBlue now pursuing an attempt to acquire Spirit.
