Philadelphia, PA immigration attorney Alex G. Isbell shares why he became a lawyer and the philosophy that guides his work. He recalls that when he enters law school, he comes in fresh from an internship with the U.S. Department of State, having just returned from overseas as a Fulbright scholar. Before that, he spends two years teaching middle school, and then suddenly finds himself immersed in the study of law. At first, he imagines a career in public international law—drafting treaties or representing the U.S. government abroad. But he quickly realizes that path is not a realistic long-term career goal.

In his first year, however, he discovers immigration law, and it strikes the same chords as his earlier ambitions, with one powerful distinction: it directly impacts individual lives. He becomes captivated by the practice because it allows him to make profound, life-changing differences for individuals and families. He never loses sight of the fact that his work has not only immediate effects but also multi-generational impacts.

In the employment-based context, he finds equal purpose—helping small businesses and large companies alike achieve their goals of growth and success. When he compares his practice with that of colleagues in other areas of law, he always feels a strong sense of pride and honor. Winning or filing an immigration case, he explains, is not about incremental legal adjustments—it’s about saving lives in asylum cases or enabling entrepreneurs to fulfill the American dream. That, to him, remains extraordinarily rewarding.

He also emphasizes the heightened responsibility immigration attorneys carry. They must be absolutely honest and clear about what is possible, what is not, and the best path forward—from moving someone from no legal status to lawful status, to helping an employer legally hire needed talent. He approaches his practice as a counselor at law, not a salesman. Sometimes that means telling people he cannot help, even if it means they walk away. But he prefers to rest easy knowing he gave them the truth rather than making a “sale.” For him, that honesty and clarity are not only ethical obligations but essential to the trust and impact that define immigration law.