IP Litigation Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia

IPR Experience

More In This Category

View Transcript

00:04
well we’re proud of our record
00:05
especially the the many cases involving
00:08
patents that amounted to a bet the
00:10
company dispute
00:11
and we’ve handled over 100 cases
00:14
and had successful outcomes that far
00:16
exceed the average
00:17
even when the ptab was considered the
00:20
patent firing squad when we were
00:21
representing a patent owner during the
00:23
early
00:24
stages of the ptab handling iprs we were
00:27
still successful
00:29
and so
00:30
part of that’s because we know the
00:32
preparation it takes
00:33
and we’re able to accurately
00:36
predict outcomes that involve
00:38
anticipation or obviousness we’re
00:41
experienced with the procedural tactics
00:43
that are that often come up during
00:46
the pre-trial phase and then during the
00:48
trial phase
00:50
that experience enables us to provide
00:52
our clients with clarity
00:54
because we can accurately predict
00:56
outcomes
00:57
perhaps most importantly we figure out a
00:59
way to make it easy for the judges to
01:01
side with us and we do that by merely
01:04
taking the most reasonable
01:06
position possible our clients also
01:08
benefit from the amount of of time that
01:11
we take teaching and writing about iprs
01:14
that requires us to continuously study
01:17
case law and matt phillips and i have
01:19
taught c elite courses
01:21
on review proceedings for over a decade
01:24
twice a year for the patent resources
01:27
group and in conjunction with those
01:29
courses we we wrote a two volume
01:30
treatise
01:32
that we updated for each course
01:34
we also co-authored 40 articles
01:37
on post-grant topics and we frequently
01:40
lecture around the country and
01:41
internationally
01:42
also i’ve served as an adjunct professor
01:44
since
01:45
2015 at the george washington university
01:48
law school all those things combined
01:50
have required us to really be on the
01:52
cutting edge and and that allows us to
01:56
know what the trends are at the board
01:58
and and uh identify ways to
02:02
help our cases with that knowledge

Washington, D.C. intellectual property lawyer Kevin Laurence talks about his firm’s experience with IPRs. He takes pride in his firm’s record, particularly in the many high-stakes patent cases that amounted to “bet-the-company” disputes. Over the years, his team has handled more than a hundred cases, achieving outcomes that far exceed industry averages—even during the early years of the PTAB, when it was often referred to as the “patent firing squad.” Despite those challenging conditions, his firm consistently secured successful results for patent owners.

He attributes that success to rigorous preparation, deep technical understanding, and the ability to accurately predict outcomes involving anticipation or obviousness. His team’s familiarity with procedural tactics—both in the pre-trial and trial phases—enables them to provide clients with a clear, realistic picture of what to expect. Just as importantly, they focus on presenting arguments in a way that makes it easy for judges to side with them—by taking the most reasonable, well-supported position possible.

Beyond litigation, he and his colleague Matt Phillips dedicate significant time to teaching and writing about inter partes reviews (IPRs). They have taught continuing legal education courses on review proceedings for over a decade through the Patent Resources Group, offering them twice a year. In conjunction with these courses, they authored a two-volume treatise on post-grant practice, which they update regularly. Together, they have also co-authored more than forty articles on post-grant topics and frequently lecture both nationally and internationally.

Since 2015, he has also served as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University Law School. He explains that this combination of teaching, writing, and practice keeps him and his team at the forefront of developments in post-grant law. Their continual engagement with evolving case law and PTAB trends allows them to apply cutting-edge insights directly to their cases—giving clients a strategic advantage built on both scholarship and experience.

More Videos From This Lawyer