More In This Category
View Transcript
Contact Daryl M. Williams
Email This Lawyer
(602) 256-9400
See All This Lawyer's Videos
Visit Lawyer's Website
Scottsdale, AZ commercial litigation attorney Daryl Williams tells the story of a case he shouldn’t have won. He states that he represented Mason McDuffie Mortgage Corporation, the world’s largest mortgage banker. A vice president branch manager had issued, on company letterhead, a $21 million loan commitment for a student apartment project in Tempe, Arizona. Mason McDuffie later refused to honor the commitment, asserting that the branch manager was not authorized to make such a decision. He was representing Mason McDuffie’s errors and omissions carrier, Lloyds of London, and advised them that the branch manager had forged Mason McDuffie’s signature and deposited the loan commitment fee into his personal account. He emphasized that the case against the branch manager was strong and recommended settling the matter.
Despite his advice, discussions with Lloyds’ coverage counsel in Los Angeles, who consulted with colleagues in New York and London, failed to produce a settlement. They did not fully grasp the seriousness of the situation. As a result, the case proceeded to an eight- or nine-week jury trial, with him representing Mason McDuffie.
During the trial, the proceedings largely favored his strategy. The opposing lawyer, a personal injury attorney working on a contingent fee, underestimated the complexity of the loan commitments and was condescending in the courtroom, which alienated the jury. Although initially he had concerns about the case, several events shifted the momentum in his favor. He successfully challenged the opposing expert’s testimony and exposed significant errors by the broker.
A pivotal moment occurred when the opposing broker testified that he had not contacted the Phoenix office because their name was allegedly not in the phone book. Seizing the opportunity, he subpoenaed the librarian from the City of Phoenix Library during the lunch break and presented multiple phone books from the relevant period, demonstrating that Mason McDuffie’s name was listed. This revelation discredited the broker and substantially influenced the jury against the opposing side.
Ultimately, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of Mason McDuffie within five hours. The jury’s negative perception of the opposing lawyer and his unprepared witnesses, along with their cavalier attitude during testimony, contributed to the decisive outcome. This case underscores the importance of meticulously preparing witnesses, cautioning them about potential “landmines” in their testimony, and emphasizing the necessity of sticking to verified facts rather than speculating or extrapolating, which could jeopardize the case.
