Wrongful Death Attorney in Los Angeles, California

$23 Million Wrongful Death Case: The case of the dangerous roadway

More In This Category

View Transcript

That was the Gilmet v. City of Los Angeles case and I think we made our name on that case. That involved an intersection in a part of LA where two neighbors were trying to use the road, one neighbors trying to make a left-hand turn, take his grandkids to school. Another neighbor is trying to ride his motorcycle to work. But the problem with that road is the two couldn’t see each other because of cars that were parked on the side and the city knew it. And so, the inevitable happened and there was a collision and the motorcyclist died. And what we learned by talking to those neighbors is they’d had this problem for a long time and it was really an accident waiting to happen. And what was more is they told the city about it but the city didn’t do anything about it. And so, we took that case and we didn’t think it was either neighbor’s fault and the jury agreed with us and gave us a full verdict against the City of Los Angeles. And that just shows the power of what a jury will do with a righteous case whether it’s against an individual or even someone as power as the City of Los Angeles, it’s a level playing field. And that was it was great to be a part of that case.

Los Angeles, CA personal injury attorney Thomas Johnston talks about a case he worked on involving a dangerous intersection that played a role in a tragic motorcycle death. He recalls the Gilmette v. City of Los Angeles case as one that helped establish his reputation. The case involved a dangerous intersection in a part of L.A. where two neighbors’ paths tragically collided: one was attempting a left-hand turn to take his grandchildren to school, while the other was riding his motorcycle to work. The road’s design—and cars parked along the side—obstructed their view of each other. The city was aware of the hazard, yet failed to address it. The inevitable happened, and the motorcyclist was killed.

Through conversations with the neighbors, he learned that this had been an ongoing problem, truly an accident waiting to happen. Importantly, both neighbors had reported the issue to the city, which still took no action. He took the case on the premise that neither neighbor was at fault, and the jury agreed, returning a full verdict against the City of Los Angeles. The case exemplified the power of a jury to deliver justice in a righteous case, regardless of whether the defendant is an individual or a powerful entity like the city. He reflects that it was an extraordinary experience to be part of that case.

More Videos From This Lawyer