Other Criminal Defense Topics Attorney in Minneapolis, Minnesota

What constitutes a terrorist threat under the law?

More In This Category

View Transcript

sure terroristic threats is a crime
that’s been around for a while it’s now
called threats of violence but it’s the
same thing and what it really means is
is if a person threatens someone of
serious bodily harm or death like I’m
going to kill you that’s terroristic
threats there doesn’t need to be any uh
overt action just the mere saying that
phrase is is what’s called teror threats
are threats of violence one of the
defenses that I have used in these cases
in the past successfully where the the
charges were dropped was that the
defendant uh said these threats uh out
of transitory anger transitory anger is
a legal term that means that you said
these threats or you threaten this other
person because you were so very upset
that you acted uh out of emotion rather
than
uh the actual intent to hurt someone so
that’s a defense to uh terroristic
threats or threats of violence

Minneapolis, MN criminal defense attorney Ryan Garry talks about what constitutes a terrorist threat under the law. He explains that what was once legally defined as terroristic threats is now classified as threats of violence, though the substance of the offense remains the same. The statute applies when a person makes a verbal threat of serious bodily harm or death, such as stating, “I’m going to kill you.” Importantly, no overt act is required; the statement alone may constitute the offense.

He notes, however, that one recognized defense is transitory anger. This legal concept applies when the threat is made in a moment of extreme emotional upset, without an actual intent to cause harm. He has successfully used this defense in prior cases, resulting in charges being dismissed.

More Videos From This Lawyer