Medical Malpractice Attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

What are the biggest challenges you face in handling medical malpractice cases?

More In This Category

View Transcript

there are a lot of challenges in medical
malpractice cases the most difficult is
frequently proving what they call
causation in a medical malpractice clam
you have to prove a lot more than just
the hospital or doctor or nurse did
something wrong doing something wrong is
not enough to succeed in a lawsuit you
have to prove that what they did wrong
was the cause of your injury or even
more importantly that the injury
wouldn’t have occurred if the negligence
hadn’t occurred so that involves a
little bit of looking into a crystal
ball and you have to prove that
information through expert testimony you
have to bring in experts in the right
Fields whether they be neurology
Rehabilitation uh emergency medicine in
order to say that uh had this infection
been diagnosed earlier you’re going to
need an infectious disease expert to say
that in virtually all cases the
antibiotic would have treated the
infection and the complication wouldn’t
have occurred in an emergency medicine
Cardiology case where a patient goes
into the ER uh with complaints of chest
pain you need testimony to show that had
the intervention been done earlier had
the aspirin been given had EKG been done
that the diagnosis would have been made
and that the treatment would have made a
difference and it’s that part that
causation that proving that the outcome
would have changed that’s most difficult
in a medical m practice case

Philadelphia, PA personal injury attorney Leon Aussprung M.D., ESQ. talks about the biggest challenges faced in handling medical malpractice cases. He notes that one of the most challenging aspects of medical malpractice cases is proving causation. It is not enough to show that a hospital, doctor, or nurse acted negligently; the plaintiff must demonstrate that the negligence directly caused the injury, or that the injury would not have occurred but for the mistake. Establishing this requires expert testimony from professionals in the relevant fields—such as neurology, rehabilitation, infectious disease, emergency medicine, or cardiology—depending on the circumstances. For example, an infectious disease expert may be needed to show that earlier diagnosis and treatment with the appropriate antibiotic would have prevented a complication. Similarly, in an emergency medicine or cardiology case, expert testimony may establish that timely intervention—such as administering aspirin or performing an EKG—would have changed the outcome. Proving that the injury or complication could have been avoided is often the most difficult part of a medical malpractice claim.

More Videos From This Lawyer