Mediation & Collaborative Divorce Attorney in Naperville, Illinois

What are the pros and cons of choosing mediation in an Illinois divorce?

More In This Category

View Transcript

so the pros to choosing mediation is

that it can be very cost effective for

the parties if the parties have already

discussed that they are going to get a

divorce they know how they’re going to

divide their property

um or they have a prenuptial agreement

or post-nuptial agreement in place it’s

going to be an easy divorce the parties

will maybe jointly want to hire a

mediator and the mediator does not

represent either party they’re an

unbiased individual that sits with the

parties and helps them come to an

agreement helps facilitate a helpful

settlement the mediator can’t give

either party uh legal advice because

they’re not their counsel but they can

tell them you know what the law says on

a certain issue if if the parties have

questions it can be voluntary or it can

be court ordered a lot of times when a

party first comes to

um the first let’s say court date for

their divorce case the judge May order

them to attend mediation and the pros

obviously if the parties are already in

agreement their cost is going to be a

lot lower because they’re just having

one attorney kind of handle everything

and handle an agreement the cons of

mediation would be if the parties are

high conflict you don’t see a ton of

these because the court if the court

knows that these families are high

conflict they try to keep them out of

mediation another con is that if

mediation doesn’t work you know you’ve

exhausted a retainer with a mediator and

then you’re also paying your separate

attorneys in a case so typically we only

see the parties in mediation who are

close to an agreement or have already

come to an agreement and are doing a

collaborative or amicable divorce

Naperville, IL family law attorney Jessica Defino discusses the pros and cons of choosing mediation in an Illinois divorce. She explains that mediation offers several advantages when it comes to divorce proceedings. One of the primary benefits is its cost-effectiveness, especially in cases where the parties have already discussed the division of property, have a prenuptial or post-nuptial agreement in place, or anticipate an easy divorce. In such situations, the parties may choose to jointly hire a mediator. A mediator is an unbiased professional who facilitates productive discussions and helps the parties reach an agreement. While they cannot provide legal advice, they can explain relevant laws and regulations if the parties have questions.

Mediation can be either voluntary or court-ordered. In some instances, when parties attend their initial court date for a divorce case, the judge may require them to undergo mediation. If the parties are already in agreement, the costs involved in mediation are significantly lower, as they only need one attorney to handle the process and finalize the agreement.

However, there are certain drawbacks to consider. Mediation may not be suitable for high-conflict cases, as the court typically tries to keep such families out of the mediation process. Additionally, if mediation fails to produce an agreement, the parties may have to bear the costs of both the mediator and their separate attorneys, which can be a financial burden. As a result, mediation is commonly utilized by parties who are either close to reaching an agreement or have already agreed upon a collaborative or amicable divorce approach.

More Videos From This Lawyer