More In This Category
View Transcript
so the pros to choosing mediation is
that it can be very cost effective for
the parties if the parties have already
discussed that they are going to get a
divorce they know how they’re going to
divide their property
um or they have a prenuptial agreement
or post-nuptial agreement in place it’s
going to be an easy divorce the parties
will maybe jointly want to hire a
mediator and the mediator does not
represent either party they’re an
unbiased individual that sits with the
parties and helps them come to an
agreement helps facilitate a helpful
settlement the mediator can’t give
either party uh legal advice because
they’re not their counsel but they can
tell them you know what the law says on
a certain issue if if the parties have
questions it can be voluntary or it can
be court ordered a lot of times when a
party first comes to
um the first let’s say court date for
their divorce case the judge May order
them to attend mediation and the pros
obviously if the parties are already in
agreement their cost is going to be a
lot lower because they’re just having
one attorney kind of handle everything
and handle an agreement the cons of
mediation would be if the parties are
high conflict you don’t see a ton of
these because the court if the court
knows that these families are high
conflict they try to keep them out of
mediation another con is that if
mediation doesn’t work you know you’ve
exhausted a retainer with a mediator and
then you’re also paying your separate
attorneys in a case so typically we only
see the parties in mediation who are
close to an agreement or have already
come to an agreement and are doing a
collaborative or amicable divorce
Contact Jessica Defino
Email This Lawyer
(630) 923-6006
See All This Lawyer's Videos
Visit Lawyer's Website
Naperville, IL family law attorney Jessica Defino discusses the pros and cons of choosing mediation in an Illinois divorce. She explains that mediation offers several advantages when it comes to divorce proceedings. One of the primary benefits is its cost-effectiveness, especially in cases where the parties have already discussed the division of property, have a prenuptial or post-nuptial agreement in place, or anticipate an easy divorce. In such situations, the parties may choose to jointly hire a mediator. A mediator is an unbiased professional who facilitates productive discussions and helps the parties reach an agreement. While they cannot provide legal advice, they can explain relevant laws and regulations if the parties have questions.
Mediation can be either voluntary or court-ordered. In some instances, when parties attend their initial court date for a divorce case, the judge may require them to undergo mediation. If the parties are already in agreement, the costs involved in mediation are significantly lower, as they only need one attorney to handle the process and finalize the agreement.
However, there are certain drawbacks to consider. Mediation may not be suitable for high-conflict cases, as the court typically tries to keep such families out of the mediation process. Additionally, if mediation fails to produce an agreement, the parties may have to bear the costs of both the mediator and their separate attorneys, which can be a financial burden. As a result, mediation is commonly utilized by parties who are either close to reaching an agreement or have already agreed upon a collaborative or amicable divorce approach.