Insurance & Personal Injury Attorney in Oklahoma CIty, Oklahoma

Can you tell us about a memorable insurance bad faith case you handled?

More In This Category

View Transcript

Bad faith in insurance only arises when a policyholder sues their own insurance company, known as “first party” insurance. In Oklahoma, the legal standard for proving bad faith is very high. It’s comparable to a high jump in athletics: while many could clear a one or two-foot bar, the bar for bad faith is set at ten feet. Insurance companies must thoroughly investigate claims, evaluate them properly, and make fair offers promptly. This high standard doesn’t apply in typical car accident cases where the insurer is not involved, which is often where insurance companies encounter issues.

Explaining this burden to a jury highlights how different it is for insurance companies when dealing with their own policyholders. For example, in 2008, Mike Burridge and the team tried a case in Lawton, Oklahoma, where they demonstrated that an insurance company had acted egregiously towards its policyholders. The company withheld significant payments and made the insured fight hard to receive what was owed. This resulted in a $130 million jury verdict, including $30 million in punitive damages. The case settled afterward, emphasizing the need for insurance companies to act in good faith and treat their policyholders fairly, as required by law.

The ability to explain these duties clearly and make them relatable to a jury is crucial, especially since many people are unfamiliar with insurance terminology. Having spent the early part of their careers representing insurance companies, the team gained a deep understanding of the industry’s practices—knowledge not typically taught in law school. This experience turned out to be a significant advantage in later cases.

Oklahoma City, OK personal injury attorney Reggie Whitten tells the story of a memorable insurance bad faith case he handled. He explains that bad faith in insurance arises exclusively when a policyholder sues their own insurance company, known as “first-party” insurance. In Oklahoma, the legal standard for proving bad faith is exceptionally high. He compares it to a high jump: while many could clear a one- or two-foot bar, the bar for bad faith is set at ten feet. Insurance companies are required to thoroughly investigate claims, evaluate them fairly, and make prompt, reasonable offers. This stringent standard does not apply in typical car accident cases where the insurer is not directly involved, which is often where insurance companies encounter fewer challenges.

He notes that explaining this burden to a jury underscores the unique responsibilities insurers have toward their own policyholders. For instance, in 2008, Mike Burridge and his team tried a case in Lawton, Oklahoma, demonstrating that an insurance company had acted egregiously toward its policyholders. The insurer withheld substantial payments, forcing the insured to fight to receive what was owed. The jury returned a $130 million verdict, including $30 million in punitive damages. The case subsequently settled, reinforcing the legal requirement for insurers to act in good faith and treat policyholders fairly.

He emphasizes that the ability to convey these duties clearly and make them understandable to a jury is critical, given that most people are unfamiliar with insurance terminology. Having spent the early part of their careers representing insurance companies, he and his team gained an in-depth understanding of industry practices—expertise not typically covered in law school—which later proved to be a decisive advantage in representing policyholders.

More Videos From This Lawyer