Products Liability Attorney in Beachwood, Ohio

What is your experience handling product liability cases?

More In This Category

View Transcript

I’ve been working on product liability
cases since I was a young lawyer in the
70s the 80s and 90s actually the product
liability cases were pretty ample for
the reason the manufacturers weren’t
guarding their machines in the workplace
and the torch system did what was
supposed to do during those years we
lawyers sued the manufacturers and the
products were made safer the products
were guarded during that period of time
I handled all kinds of product cases
point of operation injuries uh
repetitive motion injuries uh it was a
big part of my practice and the the
general theory of these cases is simple
if there’s a risk in in the use of a
product you design the risk out of the
product if you can’t design the risk out
of the product you guard against the
risk if you can’t guard against the risk
and many companies and manufacturers
will remove guards for efficiency and to
be able to produce products faster then
you warn against the the the risk and
the US you user assumes the risk of the
injury utilizing that theory we have
successfully handled product liability
cases and taking them to a good and just
result I have the experience to do that
and if you are injured in the workplace
or at home by a defective product as as
defined Ohio law we can handle that case

Beachwood, Ohio personal injury attorney Jeffrey A. Leikin talks about his experience handling product liability cases. He shares that he has been handling product liability cases since beginning his legal career in the 1970s. During the 1980s and 1990s, product liability claims were particularly prevalent because manufacturers often failed to properly guard machinery in the workplace. During that period, he and his colleagues successfully brought lawsuits against manufacturers, resulting in safer products and improved workplace protections.

He has handled a wide range of product cases, including point-of-operation injuries and repetitive motion injuries, which formed a significant part of his practice. He explains the general principle behind these cases: if a risk exists in the use of a product, the manufacturer should first attempt to eliminate the risk through design. If the risk cannot be eliminated, it should be guarded against. When guards are removed for efficiency or production speed, the final step is to warn users of the potential danger, placing the responsibility on them to take precautions.

Drawing on this framework, he has successfully guided numerous product liability cases to fair and just outcomes. He emphasizes that anyone injured at work or at home by a defective product, as defined under Ohio law, can rely on his extensive experience to pursue their claim effectively.

More Videos From This Lawyer