More In This Category
View Transcript
The most significant challenges we encounter involve resistance from the defendants. They consistently refrain from admitting in court that their product is defective. Consequently, in every case, we are compelled to substantiate the product’s defectiveness through testimony and evidence. Over the years, I have conducted numerous depositions of company representatives and amassed hundreds of thousands of pages of documents to build a compelling case. Despite having substantial evidence, the prevailing challenge lies in engaging in an arduous legal battle, as the defendants do not readily concede or express remorse for the impact on our clients. Each case becomes a hard-fought battle rather than a cooperative resolution.
Denver, CO personal injury lawyer George McLaughlin talks about the biggest challenges he faces in artificial hip failure cases. He identifies the most significant challenges in these cases as the consistent resistance from defendants. They rarely admit in court that their product is defective. As a result, he is required in every instance to prove the defectiveness of the product through testimony and evidence. Over the years, he has conducted numerous depositions of company representatives and collected hundreds of thousands of pages of documents to build a persuasive case.
Despite amassing substantial evidence, the central difficulty remains the rigorous legal battle itself. Defendants seldom concede responsibility or acknowledge the impact on clients, turning each case into a hard-fought contest rather than a cooperative resolution.
