Chicago, IL criminal defense attorney Michael Leonard discusses the federal sentencing guidelines and why are they important in cases involving federal crimes. She emphasizes that the federal sentencing guidelines are central to every federal criminal case, from the initial case evaluation and risk-benefit assessment with a client to trial strategy and, if necessary, the sentencing phase. These guidelines are essentially a framework the courts use to determine appropriate sentences, primarily based on two factors: the offense level assigned to the crime—where a higher level reflects a more serious offense—and the defendant’s criminal history, which accounts for prior convictions.

Over the past decade, federal sentencing has evolved significantly with the introduction of the 3553 factors, which allow attorneys to present mitigating evidence and encourage courts to take a holistic view of the defendant. The emphasis on sentencing guidelines reflects the often severe penalties associated with federal crimes, which can include mandatory minimum sentences of 10, 15, or 20 years—and in some cases, life imprisonment.

Given the high stakes, she stresses the importance of selecting an attorney with the skill and experience to take a case to trial. For many clients, facing such severe potential sentences makes a capable trial attorney indispensable, as achieving the best possible outcome often depends on the ability to navigate the federal system effectively and advocate decisively in court.