Employer Retaliation Attorney in Houston, Texas

What advice do you have for someone who feels they’ve been a victim of employer retaliation?

More In This Category

View Transcript

00:04
retaliation cases are
00:06
oftentimes better than the underlying
00:09
discrimination case so the law provides
00:13
for people to engage in protected
00:15
activities
00:16
such as protesting discrimination
00:19
internally
00:20
with a company’s human resources
00:22
department
00:23
that’s protected activity a lot of
00:25
people don’t know that but that
00:26
protects you as long as this document is
00:29
so easy to show to protection
00:31
filing a charge of discrimination is a
00:34
protected activity
00:36
and i always tell my clients that
00:39
once you do something that engages
00:41
protected activity
00:43
document and and understand because
00:46
the standard in retaliation cases a
00:49
little bit different than the ordinary
00:50
discrimination case
00:52
you have to show that but for
00:55
the break the engaging the protected
00:57
activity you would not have suffered an
00:59
adverse job action
01:00
so the causation standard is difficult
01:02
then motivating factor which is
01:04
what other discrimination cases have so
01:08
you’ve got to be very very careful but
01:10
having said that
01:13
it’s it’s been historically easier for
01:15
me
01:17
to sh to prove a retaliation case
01:19
because generally what happens
01:22
there’s a blatant demotion there might
01:24
be a blatant termination
01:26
and it’s sometimes easier to prove

Houston, TX employment law attorney Gregg M. Rosenberg shares his advice for someone who feels they’ve been a victim of employer retaliation. He explains that retaliation cases are often stronger than the underlying discrimination claims. The law protects individuals who engage in “protected activities,” such as internally protesting discrimination with a company’s human resources department. Many people are unaware of this, but such actions are safeguarded under the law. Filing a charge of discrimination is also considered protected activity.

He emphasizes to his clients the importance of documenting everything once they engage in a protected activity. He notes that the standard for proving retaliation differs from ordinary discrimination cases. In retaliation claims, a plaintiff must show that, but for engaging in the protected activity, they would not have suffered an adverse job action. This causation standard can be challenging, compared to the “motivating factor” standard in other discrimination cases.

Despite the higher standard, he has found that retaliation cases are often easier to prove because the adverse actions—such as a clear demotion or termination—are often blatant and well-documented, making the case more straightforward than many traditional discrimination claims.

More Videos From This Lawyer