DWI/DUI Defense Attorney in Prince William County, Virginia

Can you tell us about a memorable DUI case you handled?

More In This Category

View Transcript

I think my favorite case that I’ve ever
dealt with um
2009 uh there was a landmark Supreme
Court decision that came down in June of
2009 called melindes Diaz versus
Massachusetts I was in Fairfax County
General District Court that morning when
that decision came out and it stood for
the proposition that the government
could no longer
uh introduces evidence a lab sheet a
certificate of analysis without the
person who generated that certificate
being present in court to verify its
authenticity this was a problem for the
Commonwealth because back then they
didn’t have to do that and so we had
this case in hand that
morning and I just took my case to trial
even though I really didn’t have many
great defenses to it and when the
Commonwealth moved to admit the
certificate of analysis which again up
until that point had been just their
normal course of practice I objected on
the grounds of Melinda Diaz vs
Massachusetts and the judge looked at me
like I had three heads because they had
never heard of that case and same with
the Commonwealth Attorney um I explained
what had happened the judge took a
recess went back to Chambers read the
case came back out immediately granted
my objection and won the case

Manassas, VA criminal defense attorney Steve Duckett talks about a memorable DUI case he handled. He recalls one of his most memorable cases from 2009, coinciding with the landmark Supreme Court decision Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts. The ruling established that the government could no longer introduce a lab report or certificate of analysis without the person who prepared it appearing in court to verify its authenticity. Prior to this decision, such certificates were routinely admitted without the analyst’s testimony, presenting a significant opportunity for defense.

That morning, while in Fairfax County General District Court, he proceeded to trial on a case he was handling, despite having few conventional defenses. When the Commonwealth attempted to introduce a certificate of analysis, he objected based on Melendez-Diaz. Both the judge and the prosecutor were initially unfamiliar with the ruling. After taking a brief recess to review the decision, the judge returned and immediately sustained his objection, resulting in a favorable outcome for his client.

More Videos From This Lawyer