Contract Disputes Attorney in Chicago, Illinois

What is your approach to resolving contract disputes?

More In This Category

View Transcript

When I have a case or individual
or a company that comes to me and they

are facing some sort of a contract
dispute with another company or another
individual the first thing that you try
to do is to resolve resolve the dispute
amicably you find out if the other side
the opposing side has an attorney and
you contact the lawyers first or if they
don’t have a lawyer you contact the
point of contact
on the opposing side and you try to
resolve it in a in a amicable way you
try to
schmooze with the other individuals find
some points of interest or find
something in common and try to work it
out so you don’t have to go to court so
you don’t have to file a lawsuit if
somebody is contacting me on the other
hand with a contract dispute that my
client owes the money or somehow
breached a contract I do the same thing
I try to resolve it in a manner that
nobody has to go to court nobody has to
pay the fees and spend all this money
on lawyers
and court filings uh and and find a
middle ground an amicable ground
unfortunately
um
I find that many of the bigger firms
that handle contract disputes and
dispute resolutions rather go into
fights and go into court because that’s
how they make their money spending hours
on on Discovery spending hours on
interrogatories and preparing paperwork
and all sorts of stuff and appearances
in court and that’s how they Trump up
their bills I come from a different
school of thought maybe because I do a
lot of criminal defense work as well
where I rather not spend the money
of my client and resolve their case in
the best way possible so that’s my
Approach my Approach is to find a way
where we can resolve it in an amicable
manner that does not cost my client
thousands and thousands of dollars

Chicago, IL commercial litigation attorney Gal Pissetzky discusses his approach to resolving contract disputes. He shares that when a client—whether an individual or a company—faces a contract dispute with another party, his first priority is to resolve the matter amicably. He begins by determining whether the opposing side has legal representation. If they do, he contacts their attorney; if not, he reaches out directly to the relevant point of contact. His approach focuses on finding common ground and points of interest that can lead to a mutually acceptable resolution, avoiding the need for litigation.

Even when his client is alleged to have breached a contract or owes money, he pursues the same philosophy: resolve the dispute efficiently, minimize expenses, and prevent unnecessary court involvement. He contrasts this approach with many large law firms, which often proceed directly to litigation because their billing structures are tied to extensive hours spent on discovery, interrogatories, paperwork, and court appearances.

Drawing from his experience in criminal defense, he prioritizes his clients’ interests over billable hours. His goal is always to reach an amicable solution that protects his clients while avoiding the significant costs and delays associated with court proceedings.

More Videos From This Lawyer