Scottsdale, AZ commercial litigation attorney Daryl Williams discusses whether being a pilot helps him in aviation cases. He explains that aviation is arguably the most heavily regulated industry in the United States. The federal air regulations, found in the Code of Federal Regulations, are extensive and burdensome, surpassing even the complexity of the Internal Revenue Code. Adding to the challenge, different Flight Standard District Offices (FSDOs), also known as physios in the aviation world, interpret these regulations in varying ways. For instance, a physio in Seattle might interpret a regulation differently than the FSDO in the Phoenix area, creating a disconnect between the regulation itself and its application.

To navigate this complex regulatory landscape, it’s essential to understand how the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) operate in regulating the aviation industry. Those who are frequently involved in flying are likely familiar with the air traffic control system, ATC, and the local controllers and towers, which provides them with a greater understanding of the FAA’s responsibilities and limitations.

He notes that he initially began representing pilots because he believed the FAA was more focused on enforcing compliance with regulations than on prioritizing true air safety. Over time, however, he recognized that many pilots, who often flew for the love of aviation, were unable to afford his services. As a result, his practice shifted. He now typically represents fixed base operations (FBOs), airport sponsors, or individuals who own an FBO and become involved in disputes with airport sponsors. In these matters, his role is to navigate the complex distinctions between what is permissible and what is not within the highly regulated aviation industry.