More In This Category
View Transcript
SEC investigations can begin uh in several ways from several sources. It can be a whistleblower.
It can be a press re report in the news or media that alerts the SEC to an
issue. It is often a referral from a another regulatory agency. In fact, an insider trading investigations.
Those investigations quite often arise from referrals from
FINRA or the NASDAQ where it identifies potentially suspicious trading. The SEC
also has its own technology that identifies suspicious trading patterns
which in turn can generate leads for investigations.
Once the SEC begins investigating, it’s usually uh an informal inquiry, meaning
they do not have subpoena power, but can ask for voluntary cooperation from individuals.
For those who are licensed like uh investment advisors or uh securities broker dealers, they do not need a
subpoena because those entities are licensed and registered and must cooperate.
If the in inquiry advances or they cannot otherwise get information
without compulsion, meaning through a subpoena, the SEC will seek subpoena power and the investigation then becomes a formal investigation.
The SEC will then issue subpoenas requiring individuals and companies to
produce documents to appear for testimony under oath and will otherwise utilize its vast resources to investigate the matter.
Once the investigation has concluded, there are essentially two options for
the SEC. The first is for the SEC to analyze the evidence that it’s developed
and make a decision whether it believes it has sufficient evidence to charge or not. If it does not believe it has
sufficient evidence, it drops the case, the investigation. It’s over. If however it believes it has sufficient evidence
to prove its case, it will issue a wells notification which is a notification to
the targeted individual and their legal council that the SEC staff intends to
recommend to their client, the SEC commission, an enforcement action. And at that point,
council for the targeted defendant can respond and attempt to explain why
the SEC should not charge the client. In the alternative, if that is not successful, the matter can be negotiated
to a resolution. And if no settlement can be reached, it goes to litigation.
Contact David R. Chase
Email This Lawyer
(954) 920-7779
See All This Lawyer's Videos
Visit Lawyer's Website
Fort Lauderdale, FL SEC defense attorney David R. Chase talks about what happens in an SEC investigation. He describes how SEC investigations can begin through several different sources, including whistleblowers, news or media reports that alert the SEC to a potential issue, or referrals from other regulatory agencies. He notes that insider trading investigations, in particular, often arise from referrals from FINRA or NASDAQ when potentially suspicious trading activity is identified. He also points out that the SEC has its own technology designed to detect suspicious trading patterns, which can generate leads for further investigation.
He explains that once the SEC begins investigating, the matter is usually treated as an informal inquiry, meaning the agency does not initially have subpoena power but may request voluntary cooperation from individuals. He notes that licensed individuals and entities, such as investment advisers and securities broker-dealers, generally do not require a subpoena because they are licensed and registered and are therefore required to cooperate with the SEC. If the inquiry advances or the SEC cannot obtain the necessary information voluntarily, the agency may seek subpoena power, at which point the investigation becomes formal.
He points out that during a formal investigation, the SEC can issue subpoenas requiring individuals and companies to produce documents, appear for testimony under oath, and provide other information as the agency uses its extensive resources to investigate the matter. He states that once the investigation concludes, the SEC generally has two options: determine that there is insufficient evidence to bring charges and close the investigation, or determine that sufficient evidence exists to support an enforcement action.
He further describes the Wells notification process, explaining that if the SEC staff believes it has sufficient evidence to pursue charges, it may issue a Wells notification to the targeted individual and their legal counsel informing them that the staff intends to recommend an enforcement action to the SEC Commission. He notes that counsel then has an opportunity to respond and present reasons why the SEC should not bring charges against the client. If that effort is unsuccessful, he explains that the parties may attempt to negotiate a resolution, and if no settlement can be reached, the matter may ultimately proceed to litigation.
