Medical Malpractice Attorney in Beachwood, Ohio

What is your experience handling medical malpractice cases?

More In This Category

View Transcript

I’ve been handling medical M practice
cases for the past 20 years it’s
important to have an experienced lawyer
handle these type of cases you wouldn’t
want to go to a doctor who’s for KN knee
surgery who’s never performed knee
surgery before likewise you wouldn’t
want to go to a doctor for back surgery
who’s never performed back surgery
before they’re very difficult and they
require large finan L by the lawyer in
order to handle the case properly I
remember a case some years back that I
handled involving a woman who had a
tumor in her abdomen that the surgeon
attempted to take out endoscopically
through an endoscope running down her
throat the tumor was removed by the
endoscope and and the surgeon properly
but the woman wound up bleeding out in
the pacu unit after the surgery the
reason the surgeon chose the endoscope
was because it didn’t make a scar it it
wouldn’t be disfiguring for the patient
however once I got that case or once the
firm got that case we investigated and
researched the literature the literature
St clearly that the size tumor that
woman had should never have been taken
out by an endoscope one of the reasons
for that was because you could not
adequately identify post-operative
bleeding we were able to obtain a mid
seven figureure the result for that
patient on the Eva trial the reason it
was the Eva trial is because in these
Medical malale Practice cases the
insurance companies do not settle until
they know you are prepared to go to
trial only an experienced male practice
lawyer can take it to that stage

Beachwood, Ohio personal injury attorney Jeffrey A. Leikin talks about his experience handling medical malpractice cases. The lawyer has been handling medical malpractice cases for the past 20 years. It is crucial to have an experienced attorney manage these types of cases; one would not want to consult a doctor for knee surgery who has never performed such a procedure. Similarly, it is unwise to seek treatment from a doctor for back surgery who lacks experience in that area. These cases can be very complex and require significant financial investment by the lawyer to manage them effectively.

The lawyer recalls a case from several years ago involving a woman with a tumor in her abdomen. The surgeon attempted to remove it endoscopically, using an endoscope inserted through her throat. Although the tumor was successfully removed, the woman ultimately suffered severe bleeding in the post-anesthesia care unit following the surgery. The surgeon chose the endoscopic approach to avoid creating a visible scar, as it would be less disfiguring for the patient.

However, once the law firm took on the case, they conducted thorough research and investigated the relevant literature. The findings clearly indicated that the size of the tumor should never have been removed via an endoscope. One key reason for this is that the technique does not allow for adequate identification of post-operative bleeding. Ultimately, the firm was able to secure a mid-seven-figure settlement for the patient.

The case was part of the Eva trial process, which is significant in medical malpractice cases because insurance companies often do not settle until they are confident that the attorney is prepared to go to trial. Only an experienced malpractice lawyer can take a case to that stage.

More Videos From This Lawyer