More In This Category
View Transcript
Last year, we handled a very significant and tragic case involving a young man who arrived at the hospital with clear symptoms of brain swelling. For a long time, we couldn’t understand why no one responded appropriately until we reviewed the cell phone records of the residents overseeing his care. As is often the case in hospitals, there was a discrepancy between the official records and what was actually happening to the patient.
The cell phone records revealed that the residents were not given proper guidance, were left to manage on their own, and were making mistakes without receiving the necessary support. Consequently, our client did not get the timely care he needed, resulting in a severe brain injury. This case highlighted a dangerous practice where the younger, less experienced residents communicated via text messages without the oversight of more senior physicians, who relied solely on the official medical records.
Essentially, everyone under 40 was using text messaging for communication, while the more experienced individuals over 40 were reviewing the official medical record. This lack of communication between the junior staff using cell phones and the senior staff reviewing records led to a disconnect in patient care. Senior physicians were unaware of the real-time issues the junior residents were facing, causing a gap in proper evaluation and intervention.
One frustrating aspect of hospital cases is the rigid hierarchy within these institutions. Although a chain of command is often necessary, it can prevent effective self-evaluation when problems arise. Surgeons may deny responsibility and blame hospitalists, who in turn may blame nurses, and so forth. As medical malpractice professionals, our role is to scrutinize behavior at every level of this hierarchy, enabling us to gain a clearer understanding of what happened to our clients, often better than the treating staff in the hospital themselves.
San Francisco, CA medical malpractice attorney Nathaniel Leeds tells the story of a memorable hospital malpractice case he handled. He recalls that he recently managed a tragic and significant case involving a young man who presented to the hospital with clear signs of brain swelling. At first, it was unclear why no one responded appropriately until his team uncovered the residents’ cell phone records. As is often the case in hospital settings, there was a sharp contrast between what was documented in the official records and what was actually occurring at the bedside.
The cell phone records revealed that the residents overseeing the patient’s care had been left without proper guidance, forced to manage on their own, and making critical errors without adequate supervision. As a result, the young man did not receive timely intervention, leading to a severe brain injury. This case exposed a troubling practice: junior residents communicated primarily through text messages, while senior physicians relied exclusively on the official medical records.
Essentially, younger staff under 40 were exchanging real-time information via text, while older, more experienced physicians over 40 were reviewing only the medical record. This disconnect created a dangerous communication gap, leaving senior physicians unaware of the immediate problems the junior staff was confronting.
One of the most frustrating aspects of hospital malpractice cases, he noted, is the rigid hierarchy that often exists in these institutions. While a chain of command may be necessary, it can also obstruct accountability when errors occur. Surgeons may deny responsibility and shift blame to hospitalists, who may in turn blame nurses, and so on. His role as a malpractice attorney is to examine conduct at every level of this hierarchy, often enabling him to piece together what truly happened with greater clarity than the hospital staff themselves.
