Mediation & Collaborative Divorce Attorney in Sacramento, California

How does mediation work in divorce cases?

More In This Category

View Transcript

so mediation is where you have one
attorney that doesn’t represent either
party that is acting as a neutral in
trying to facilitate an agreement that
resolves all the issues similar to
collaborative so um the end result being
a marital settlement agreement again
similar to collaborative resolving
custody child and spousal support and
property division the difference between
mediation and collaborative is that that
mediator is is not representing either
party so they’re not there to you know
help the parties determine is there is
this in their best interest they’re not
going to get and underneath an agreement
to determine you know is this really
what you want why is this what you want
and then you know investigating and
analyzing choices that are interest
based their job is to get an agreement
between the parties that’s why people
often prefer collaborative because
allows for a lot more in-depth
discussion and empowers the parties more
with support so they’ve got their own
attorney in their corner and they’ve got
you know a mental health person who can
also help them unearth what what is it
they really want and why um and that’s
going to be best for them and then
coming up with solutions that work for
both whereas a mediator is is trying to
come up with an agreement but they’re
not getting into that kind of depth so
collaborative I think provides a lot
more satisfaction uh than mediation does
but it is a quick and dirty and it’s
usually less expensive um than any other
model

Sacramento, CA family law attorney Mary Molinaro talks about how mediation works in divorce cases. Mediation involves a neutral attorney who does not represent either party but instead facilitates an agreement to resolve all issues, similar to collaborative law. The end result is a marital settlement agreement that addresses custody, child and spousal support, and property division.

The primary distinction between mediation and collaborative law is that the mediator does not represent either party. Their role is not to help the parties determine what is in their best interest or to analyze and explore choices based on the parties’ interests. Instead, the mediator focuses on reaching an agreement between the parties.

Many individuals prefer the collaborative approach because it allows for deeper discussions and empowers the parties by providing support. Each party has their own attorney and may also have access to a mental health professional who can assist in identifying what they truly want and why. This collaborative process aims to develop solutions that work for both parties, whereas mediation seeks to create an agreement without delving into that level of depth.

Overall, collaborative law tends to offer greater satisfaction than mediation, but mediation is often quicker and less expensive compared to other models.

More Videos From This Lawyer