Chicago, IL criminal defense attorney Gal Pissetzky talks about his experience in defending fraud cases. In the realm of fraud, a multitude of issues and cases exists, spanning from mortgage fraud to offenses against social security, theft, and various other crimes categorized under the fraud title. It is crucial to emphasize that each fraud case maintains its distinct characteristics, even when similarities arise in scenarios, such as those seen in bank fraud.

To ascertain the most effective defense in a fraud case, a thorough examination of the discovery becomes imperative. Irrespective of the specific fraud type, discovery in fraud cases is typically extensive. Government disclosures frequently entail external hard drives with substantial data volumes, necessitating a meticulous review to unearth pertinent details concerning the client’s purported involvement in the fraud.

Fraud cases, especially those entailing conspiracy charges with multiple co-defendants, pose a challenge. Government-provided discovery often spans all defendants, requiring a scrupulous process to sift through copious amounts of information and extract relevant details for each individual.

The investigative nature of fraud cases, often centered around a paper trail, demands considerable work and experience. Attorneys must navigate through numerous documents to identify key information crucial for constructing a robust defense strategy. The complexity lies in connecting the dots and presenting, during trial, how the components of the paper trail interconnect, elucidating the alleged actions of the client. Even in cases involving only one co-defendant, fraud cases typically entail a substantial amount of documentation, underscoring the intricate nature of these investigations.