Children’s Rights Attorney in Portland, Oregon

Why are attorneys sometimes appointed to represent minors?

More In This Category

View Transcript

so in domestic relations cases or
dissolution cases typically divorce
cases or modification of parenting plan
cases sometimes you know a child is not
considered to be a party the parties are
the parents but because of the high
conflict in these types of cases because
of the fact that a lot of Judges don’t
want children to be in their courtroom
and having to testify especially against
one parent or another depending on their
age especially there there’s a program
in Oregon or there’s a statute that
requires that a judge appoint an
attorney if a child requests one in a
family law case or the judge has the
option to appoint it if either parent
requests an attorney so children are are
appointed attorneys so that their voices
are heard in court and so that there’s
the chance that they won’t have to
testify live in court
work

Portland, OR family law attorney Matthew Muenzen talks about why attorneys are sometimes appointed to represent minors. He states that in domestic relations cases—such as divorces or modifications of parenting plans—a child is typically not considered a party to the case; rather, the parties are the parents. However, given the high-conflict nature of many of these cases and the reluctance of judges to require children to testify, particularly against one parent, Oregon law provides a mechanism to ensure children’s voices are heard without putting them directly on the stand.

Under Oregon statute, if a child requests an attorney in a family law matter, the court is required to appoint one. Additionally, a judge has the discretion to appoint an attorney for the child if either parent makes such a request. This process allows children to have legal representation, ensures their perspectives are considered, and helps minimize the emotional burden of testifying in open court.

More Videos From This Lawyer