Appeals Attorney in Alexandria, Virginia

Tell us about a memorable criminal appeal you handled.

More In This Category

View Transcript

I’ve had a lot but I’ll mention this one
merely because I did the argument this
morning um in the federal court down the
street in Alexandria it was appeal
appeal about the right to a jury trial
and what they call a petty offense in
federal court so a lot of people don’t
know this but even though the Sixth
Amendment says a jury trial right
applies in all criminal prosecutions it
doesn’t if you’re charged with a
misdemeanor in federal court that
carries only up to 6 months in jail
often this would be like on the national
park there is no right to a jury trial
so I challenged that back in 2009 to the
fourth circuit and I have another case
raising that which I argued today on
this level it will lose the case needs
to be decided by the US Supreme Court
and I really think that’s interesting
because because in federal court you
essentially don’t have the right to a
jury trial on a DUI it’s harder to
negotiate it’s hard for the clients this
kind of stuff so really this is just an
issue I’ve always been interested in and
I hope to argue it in the fourth circuit
later this year

Alexandria, VA criminal defense attorney Chris Leibig talks about a memorable criminal appeal he handled. He recalls many notable cases, but highlights one he argued recently in federal court in Alexandria. The case involved the right to a jury trial in what is classified as a “petty offense” under federal law. While the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in all criminal prosecutions, he explains that this right does not extend to federal misdemeanors carrying a maximum sentence of six months. An example of such a case would be certain offenses committed in national parks.

He first challenged this limitation in 2009 before the Fourth Circuit, and he continues to pursue the issue, having argued a related case that same morning. He notes that while the case may ultimately be decided against him, the question is significant and likely requires resolution by the U.S. Supreme Court.

He emphasizes the practical implications: in federal court, defendants charged with certain misdemeanors—such as DUI—do not have a guaranteed right to a jury trial, which can complicate negotiations and affect client outcomes. He has maintained a long-standing interest in this legal issue and anticipates arguing another case on the matter in the Fourth Circuit later this year.

More Videos From This Lawyer