Alimony and Spousal Maintenance Attorney in Boston, Massachusetts

What issues arise in the area of MA spousal support?

More In This Category

View Transcript

the biggest challenge right now in
Massachusetts relative to CH to uh
spousal support and also child support
is this new case law Cavanaugh came out
in the appeals court the end of last
year and what is uh interesting about
this is no one knows how it’s going to
be implemented because it’s a dramatic
change in how alimony and child support
together have been calculated so what’s
happened in the past what has been
troubling to me is I will have a client
who has no children and will get let’s
pretend you know 25% of the gross income
for alimony however if that same woman
had three children child support would
have been calculated and and you would
get less so a woman with no children got
more alimony more support I should say
than a person than the woman with
children that’s just an example and that
what I think the appeals Cor was trying
to do is Rectify that and I I think
their goal is admirable but the judges
are H resistant to change that
dramatically and there I think that
there’s a real challenge as to what it
is um that we need to take into
consideration if you read the case
literally every source of income even
from Perks is to be used for child
support and the alimony has to be run
there’s three different ways you run it
um with the child support first and the
alimony calculation first and then an
analysis and that has been a real
challenge right now as to know to know
what to expect from the court however my
focus has been on getting the best
result for my client and taking into
consideration this new case law and
trying to do the fair
thing

Boston, MA family law attorney Terri Partridge talks about the issues that arise in the area of MA spousal support. She faces the biggest challenge in Massachusetts concerning spousal support and child support due to the recent case law Kavanaugh that emerged in the appeals court at the end of last year. The intriguing aspect is the uncertainty surrounding its implementation, given its significant alteration in the calculation of alimony and child support.

Historically, a client without children might receive, for instance, 25% of the gross income for alimony. However, if the same woman had three children, the calculation of child support would lead to a lesser amount. In this scenario, a woman with no children would receive more alimony or support than a woman with children. This serves as an example of the issue the appeals court aimed to address, with an admirable goal of rectification. Nevertheless, judges exhibit resistance to such drastic changes, posing a considerable challenge in determining its impact.

The case, when interpreted literally, mandates that every source of income, including perks, be utilized for child support. The alimony calculation must follow three different approaches: considering child support first, alimony calculation first, and then conducting an analysis. Understanding what to anticipate from the court has become a genuine challenge. Despite this, her primary focus remains on achieving the best outcome for her client, taking into account the implications of this new case law and striving to ensure fairness.

More Videos From This Lawyer