Yes, I think that it’s well suited for a lot of different cases, but I think it’s well suited for situations where there are a lot of assets and people have high net worth. Sometimes in those cases, one of the issues is valuing assets, and if you get two competing experts arguing about what something is worth, then it can really drive the cost up, and it can also create a lot of conflict and interfere with the ability to try to get it resolved. So in a collaborative context, you typically just have one neutral person who is valuing assets and doing things like that: a financial professional. And I just think it streamlines things. It makes it less likely for people to argue. I mean you could still have disputes, but I just think it helps in that context. That’s one example.